#ShirtsAndSkorts - No.1 - [:Question & Answer #1:] (Reality Check) August 2nd 2024
"Things To Talk About and Clarify Spiritualy in Spirit & Truth Of All Earth-Wide Reality"
"Inter-Person-Co-mmunity Discernment" :
[-Men & Women of All Ages - there being only Male & Female born into Life Amongst, Respective of Each's Oneness of Flesh & Being Made In God's Image Through Christ Jesus without "man-made 'confusion theories' " ; (God is not 'Confused' to put a man's soul in a woman's body or a woman's soul in a man's body)-]
-For those who Are still in denial and got offended at the #ShirtsAndSkorts truth.
-These questions will have to be answered by both genders concerning dressing and covering though given the nature of the reality "exposed":
-I realised #PartakersPt3 needs it's own blog and to see people's comments (if necesary), otherwise the point being TO CLARIFY HOW VASTLY CLEAR THE MATTER'S ARE, & HOW DECEIVED SOME ARE BY THINGS THEY HAVE BEEN PRESENTED OUT OF CONTEXT, OF WHICH IN GOD'S CONTEXT ARE EXTREMELY BLESSED & BLESSINGLY AWESOME BEYOND THE DECEPTION'S QUENCHING COMPREHENSION OF ALL THIS TRUTH THAT EVERYONE BEING EITHER A MALE OR FEMALE KNOW CONSISTING OF OUR VERY INHERENT BEING.
6 Basic Spirit & Truth Reality Questions :
1) when you are wearing a t shirt/skirt or shorts/skorts, whether below your knees or above, are you considering your legs fully covered, or can you admit your arms, partial biceps, shins, perhaps maybe knees or part of your thighs are naked? We can agree that the waistline & topmost of sexual organs of both sees can be covered here, (tanktops & shorts/skirts), but are we supposed to say that "it is the same" as being fully covered by reason?
2) if you feel "more comfortable" in shorts and less covering, doesn't that mean you feel "less comfortable being fully covered"?
3) Do you appreciate people who love to see you fully covered, or people that appreciate the less covering you have on your body more?
4) are you offended when people notice even just to themselves that they can see their brother or sister's other half's nakedness and do not want to interact in any way concerning your "desired dress code"?
5) are u aware that feeling hot or sweaty concerning the CONSCIENCE, also at least for the point given here carries at least your own "weight of awareness" that such of yourself can be seen by others? (Concerning being scorched by the sun's heat > book of revelation > this not the worlds understanding considering the body's effect from the sun's heat in any context)
6) if you like ripped clothing, t shirts or jeans, how come you haven't considered that you can wear something underneath it also to cover up the ripped part and still have it there?
On that last point, any "x-ray" device that can possibly see through a persons clothes, or rather, any idea of basis being JUST BECAUSE IT IS POSSIBLE, such excuses being nonsensical because everyone knows purposefuly that there's a difference between checking to see if someone has a gun or knife to harm someone and using this to sexualy interact with someone else's body.
I know certain "religions" have these traits of fears, concerns, surrounding idealisms, but that's besides the point, because spirit and truth Christians do understand this beyond "traditionalism" in the matter of anything about "covering/clothing".
This is why tue mention of Revelation chapter 1, The Lords covering beginning at the feet, where there are the ankles (& the respective wrist & neck discernment).
Individual facts of people & life are that every single individual person made in God's image has a different fleshly body, so concerning fashion's inconsideration, there is that any "general dimensions" of things, e.g. jeans (waist=?/length=?/width-bust-cut=?), an example of "boot cut" jeans is for quite few people in the 2 dimensions heneraly all clothes are given out of waist and length. What they call skinny jeans reveals this for peole with the same leg length and waist size but different leg thickness on all fronts top and bottom of. Then to top it all of considering ONGOING CHANGR AND DIFFERENT DIFFENCES OF GROWTH & PROGRSSIONS OF STATE.
****Specific mention of discipline orientation for both men and women, the utmost starts with consideration of 1Peter3's mention of "beauty", which also concerns "decency", and for this generation old "cleavage" ideology from what is termed "revealing clothing", it really is an unnecessary discussion and very obvious beginning on the female's side who's satisfaction should come from the breast, considering the fruit of childbearing and suckling for any matter of fact. I used the word discipline because for God loving women it's disciplined to known when your own personal body being covered is not in comparison to "cleav-age-ology", no need to argue "where the breast starts/ends".
Concerning proximity contextualization, both at heart, as well as fleshly purposeful outworking amongst men & women in Respects to God who's image we are made in especialy of each one's oneness of flesh amongst others, when it come's to intimacy between the oneness of flesh confines begining with men, we know a wife (e.g.) while they both sleep, spends a large ammount of time in his bossom, and so do his chidren from their fruitfulness of her womb.
Proverbs 5:18 Let thy fountain be blessed: and rejoice with the wife of thy youth.(the one & only of faithfulness and fidelity in Oneness of flesh and being inside and out)
5:19 Let her be as the loving hind and pleasant roe; let her breasts satisfy thee at all times; and be thou ravished always with her love.
5:20 And why wilt thou, my son, be ravished with a strange woman, and embrace the bosom of a stranger?
****The other lines in the song #ShirtsAndSkorts about scuba divers in refference concerning "swim wear", specificaly considering "technological ability", or in other words "manufacturability", is an ACTUAL REALITY FOR LONGER THAN SOME CARE,TO THINK despite "fashionable inconsistency" based on the extremely evident and exposed hypocricy, especialy by the "female fashion" department concerning "fashionable PUBLIC NAKEDNESS, e.g. "revealing clothing - subject example = "cleavage".
Why the lyrics in the song #ShirtsAndSkorts are not just Lyrics, but acrual revelatory REALITY OF WHAT MOST PEOPLE ARE TAUGHT ABOUT ONGOINGS OF SUCH NATURE, where anyone can Analyse the following :
[ : Bikini "top and bottom" --> (????? surface area covering = ????? <-> *****CONSIDERED DECENT PUBLIC WEAR*****) :] <------ :or: ------> [ : "bra and panties"/underwear (???? surface area covering = ?!?!? <-> CONSIDERED UNDERGARMENTS - *****private under wear*****) : ]
..... THE ABOVE WITH CLEAR CONCLUSION LOOKING AT EARTH-WIDE OVERALL REALITY (lack of knowlede, or at least DISCERNMENT is a serious thing to define "Deception" of such context & magnitude)
****Just because there is swimming and water involved, speaks volumes as though we are unable to very REASON-ably & purposefuly "full body" anything for water encounters, when we actualy already do so considering "scuba diving", & the very helpful body suits involved, they actualy being very helpful incase you step on sharp rocks or your thigh arm or knee brush against something abrasive or hard in natural water based environments when swimming (lakes/ponds/rivers/ocean beach beds etc).
For men we can look at "boxer shorts" vs "shorts", & basically do the same analysis between "speedo swimming pants" & "thighline underwear", It's a question of honesty and being REASONABLY & PURPOSEFULY truthful about these issues all over the place & what is considered normal.
For so many things concerning fashion, "just looking nice" on the outside doesn't make sense when it REQUIRES nakedness to do so.
At the point of someone looking at "cargo pants" and the pockets on the side of the leg bottoms, and any "hiking" clothing e.g. a "fannie pack", considering "pockets", also to think of life as a community utility, as if its only to carry things for ourselves, where at the moment most of "fashionable" pants for the past 5 years can barely fit a single cellphone in the pocket, some so small even a wallet or keys can't fit, they just there to LOOK at for "design's sake". Yes you can be fully covered in the sort of idea designated for being able to carry a backpack(satchel) on your back or "shoulder strap bag"(most people only think gucci-bag's for their design) around if you need to carry anything for yourself and others, but that's besides the point.
It's really not a debate, just a reveal on PURPOSEFUL clothing, other than "SEXY(sexualy apealing) CLOTHING", the word "CLOTHING", meaning the concealing/COVERING of one's nakedness, SPECIFICALY ALSO BECAUSE ANYONE'S BODY IS NOT THEIR OWN, EVEN IF THEY DO NOT HAVE THE MUTUALY COMMITED PERSON YET, THAT PERSON'S BODY ALSO BELONGING TO THEM SEXUALY & NAKED-LY SPEAKING OVERALL >>>***FROM*** THE UTMOST.
It's 2024 (Julian calendar-wise) & it's been a while getting to this point, 2024 years x 365 days (738, 760) give or take between leap years.
-TeQ NiQ - Kudzai Simbarashe David Murapa
#Revelation18SnapBack
#RevelationMusicFam
#RevelationMusicFamily
#RevelationMusicZim